Scum: The faces of Britain's welfare culture

Those following the news in Britain today were treated to no less than three stories showing the depths of depravity which 50 years of the Welfare State has created.

These are the stories:

1.  A mother, who won the distinction of being the first woman to be jailed in the UK for not sending her daughter to school, appeared as a witness in a court case because she had been slashed with a knife for not paying a £10 (US$15) drug debt (she is self-confessed drug dealer).

2.  A woman has appeared in court charged with kidnapping her own daughter.  It is alleged that following a high-profile case of a child that was abducted in Portugal, that this family decided to make their daughter 'disappear' in order to get some of the fame and money the McCann's case had attracted.

3.  A woman said to be in the 'lowest 1% of intelligence' has been convicted of not informing the authorities when her partner abused their child.  The abuse ended when her partner broke the infant's back across his knee like a twig.

These three stories on one day would offend the sensibilities of the most callous and jaded Satanist, but what was particularly shocking about these stories were the faces that glowered out at you from the pages.

Greasy, lank hair scraped back off the face in what has come to be known as the 'council house facelift'. Mean, feral, eyes glinting bleakly out from the sallow complexions associated with a poor diet and lifetime of drink, drugs, and squalor.  

This is what 50 years of compassion and welfare has done to the British people.  It has created a vicious and dangerous underclass, so morally lost that pretending your daughter has been abducted is just another way to get money, where people will get slashed or shot for $15, or where a child is a toy to be broken and thrown away.

When man loses his dignity, he falls lower than the animals. 

I've not named the people involved in this case, but these are their photographs.  I will not even go to trouble of defining which of these faces is responsible for which crime - they all blend into one face, one open sore on humanity.

  

Weakness and corrupted compassion has filled Britain with these monsters.  Only policies reflecting Satanic ideals of natural law and social Darwinism will ever allow us to be free of them 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 10/26/2008 5:39 AM J Spirit wrote:
    What form of "social Darwinism"? Since these women, men and children are so dysfunctional and damaged, their lack of effect upon society and lesser chance of substantial contribution to the gene pool seems to take care of itself. I think the welfare system does weaken, but it seems to contribute to these types' continual unfitness for their environment. The problem seems to take care of itself. The only problem remaining is perhaps the future lack of resources to support the unfit.
    Reply to this
    1. 10/26/2008 9:38 AM Julian Karswell wrote:
      I've got to differ from you there Mizz Crowley, this is a situation which is not sorting itself out as it should.
      While from extreme cases such as I mentioned in the main post, it would seem that the underclass is manoevering itself out of existence, this betrays the truth of the massive problems of low-level deprivation.

      One of the biggest problems we have is from the feckless reproducing for short-term gain, and then leaving the state to raise their children.  Unlike the USA, the UK welfare system has a set of absolute entitlements, so if you have children- you are entitled to welfare.  Period.  Even former Prime Minister Tony Blair used to brag that he claimed his child benefits.  Can you imagine an American president admitting he claims welfare?

      These absolute entitlements mean that for many, having children is more lucrative than working, and leads to some truly bizarre situations such as this workless family who are receiving £170,000 (US$250,000+) in welfare payments a year, just by having a large family Welfare family in £1.2m luxury home.

      OK, extreme cases make for bad policies, but there are many, many thousands of similar stories of a less extreme degree.  It has got to the state where even relatively well-off middle class home are limiting the size of their families to one or two children (or even no children) because they can't afford to pay for the extra tuition and save for a college fund to give their young the right start in life.

      Meanwhile, those in workless families find that having a large family means that they are entitled to a large house and welfare payments which total more than the income of the minimum-wage jobs they are equipped for. Statistically, if you are raised in one of these workless families, the chances of you being workless yourself are pretty high. The underclass is growing, not diminishing.

      The kind of interventions necessary are quite simple.

      1) Cap all welfare payments to a maximum of the amount earned by a minimum wage job.

      2) Cap all welfare payments at the point of entry - i.e. you can't 'move up the system'. 

      3) A strict time limit of 18 months on all benefits.

      4) Phasing out of unemployment benefits altogether in favour of private insurance.

      Within a very short space of time, the message would get through that having children with no income is a fast track to poverty - not a bigger house.  This would have to be backed up with birth control campaigns - enforced birth control where necessary to protect the welfare of children, such as the three cases mentioned in my original posting.



      Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.